Trial book-Advocacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 8000 words

Trial book-Advocacy - raise ExampleIt commenced on January 23, 2012 and lasted for nine days and closed on February 2, 2012. I witnessed the proceedings from the public header and therefore, would comment on the trial as a neutral observer. The hearing on sentencing took place on March 8, 2012 at which I was present.1 In order to protect the right to confidentiality of those involved in the proceedings, their name had been changed. I also had a brief circumstances to examine the court documents, which were provided to me by the prosecution advise during the trial. During the trial I had taken about notes which were used for this Trial Book and had also integrated some of my ideas in it to provide it a proper structure and form. The art of storytelling is fundamental to evocative and effective conversation to attain the objectives of understanding. An attorney has two chances to communicate to the fact-finder during a trial, through opening and closing furrows. The more compe lling the counsel is in telling the story, the more chances are that the fact-finder will rule in favour of the argument of the advocate. When advocates use good story telling techniques they will be able to draw the Jurys attention and take out them understand their points clearly. This note highlights triple basic storytelling techniques that a practitioner can hold to create his narration of the case, either in opening or closing, more believable. Tell the story or fact of the case in the present tense form, speak in obvious, active English and touch on the listener to the course of events. This trial book will tint at the daily proceedings in the court and how every process is handled by the concerned, particularly the prosecution and defence counsels. It will also look into detail how each of the counsel has used language and other advocacy techniques and methods in arguing their cases and the touch on it had on the case from an overall point of view. Jurors in criminal t rials can ask questions, which provide them the chance to be interactive in a trial. It is also considered as a valuable instrument to transmit essential clarification of facts and to fill gaps in information, so as to bring out every germane(predicate) factors of the case. The jury continually asks questions to confirm information regarding various factors of the case. On the other hand, in some cases, it is seen that jurors do not understand certain aspects of a case, which may lead them to disregard certain information. Advocates must(prenominal) befriend with other counsels for the timely preparation of a trial proceeding brief of documents in order to hang the management of documentary proof at trial by the court, witness and counsel. Advocate also must be conversant regarding the provisions of the law, their impact on the offence etc. In addition, they should thoroughly aim for the case with every relevant background details and information. This trial book intends to de lineate all these aspects and to adorn how trial are conducted in courts, the procedures and also how effective use of language and rhetoric can make a difference in jurors decisions and winning a case. Facts of the Case On July 27, 2011 three defendants are charged with conspiracy to supply a large quantity of cocaine drugs Class A under the law Section 1(1) 1977 in North West London.2 Three people HH, AR, SW were the chiefly